Filed by motir run MOTIR-657 on 2026-08-26. The correction is already submitted as plan cmtal3vdv0054i3phuw5zdwxh (awaiting approval); this card is the defect RECORD.
MOTIR-1158, MOTIR-1159 and MOTIR-1160 each carried, simultaneously:
type: content · executor: coding_agent;Type: manual (legal) · Executor: human (founder + counsel);A card that cannot be finished by its own executor does not fail loudly. It either stalls at motir run guard #2 on a human with nothing prepared, or it is drafted by an agent and closed with the counsel review silently dropped — and for a published legal document that second outcome is the expensive one.
The likely history, from the timestamps rather than from memory: MOTIR-1134/1135/1136/1137 all carry an identical updatedAt of 2026-08-01T15:49:39.486Z, which is the signature of a bulk field normalisation. MOTIR-1133's fields were corrected to decision/coding_agent in the same era — deliberately and correctly, per the standing rule that a decision card's executor is the agent that writes the ADR. The same pass appears to have set executor: coding_agent across the story without re-estimating and without touching the prose, so the field said one thing and every sentence around it said another.
The bulk edit was right about MOTIR-1133 and wrong about the three drafting cards, and nothing distinguished them — which is the general shape worth recording: a normalisation that is correct for the majority of a set is applied to the whole set, and the minority it breaks carries no signal a field-level pass could see.
It did not. validate_work_item on MOTIR-657 returns likely-over-gate-sizing for all three — the shipped advisory reached this before this run did. What was missing was a step that READ it: the advisory channel is deliberately non-blocking, readiness.ready was true, and validate_work_item on the story returns valid: true. Every green signal agreed the story was fine.
docs/decisions/legal-document-set.md §3 as open founder input and filed as its own proposed card (8.4.9). No card owned this before.privacy@ / security@ / legal@motir.co). MOTIR-2596 provisioned the mailbox and explicitly deferred the address SET to 8.4.1; 8.4.1 decided the set, and the console action is now its own proposed card (8.4.10).MOTIR-1159's cookie inventory was short by eleven. The card enumerated four cookies; origin/main at 4f70366d6 sets fifteen — both 2FA cookies (merged in PR #2314 three hours before the measurement) and every OAuth CSRF/PKCE cookie for the five importer/connector flows, plus motir_pending_idea, which stores up to 2000 characters of visitor-typed text pre-authentication.
The no-banner conclusion survives the larger set, so nothing about the DECISION was wrong. But a Cookie Policy is a published enumeration, and the card would have shipped one missing eleven entries. Root cause shared with the defect above: a count written into a card body is a snapshot, and the product kept moving. The corrected MOTIR-1159 now points at the decision record's table rather than at its own prose.
validate_work_item on MOTIR-657, 2026-08-26: likely-over-gate-sizing on MOTIR-1158 (240 min), MOTIR-1159 (300 min), MOTIR-1160 (210 min).get_work_item, 2026-08-26, quoted verbatim above.origin/main at 4f70366d6 (not a working tree): lib/auth/index.ts, lib/organizations/cookie.ts, lib/workspaces/middleware.ts, lib/i18n/actions.ts, lib/onboarding/pendingIdea.ts, and the five OAuth start routes under app/api/.docs/decisions/legal-document-set.md, PR #2320.The plan is submitted and the three cards are commented and held at Blocked. This card needs no build work — it closes when plan cmtal3vdv0054i3phuw5zdwxh is approved or declined and the outcome is noted here.